Lusekofte

I really hope for catalina and Bettys.

I do not think they will replicate il 2 But honestly that is the best ai to compare with. I think ai going to be rubbish at start. And you wish it had il 2 46 ai to deal with. No one will abandon the game in the start because of the ai. It will take time to get that fed up

Ai in 46 was developed in a lot of years and gotten improved. It do not use same fm as player. Personally I think it would be perfect combined with good communication. AI as in GB take just as many resources as a human player and set number restrictions not suitable for most big air battles. Any form of complexity will reduce performance. Ai talk with code , pacific fighters age do not render it not modern. The code just have to fit the software. There are consequences for what we ask for. we want massive airbattles, and smart ai. It can not be done GB way. AI is a expencive and time consuming thing to get right. And I think we need to look at them as padawan’s or apprentices in the start. Jason first grey hairs appeared trying to sort ai

One of the things I do love with DCS is their startup training missions. They take you around the cockpit and teach you the real procedure and why. I did a repetition on P 47. Just love that plane. They do teach you on how and why you should be kind to the engine. The complexity of engine damage and small parts in undercarriages and other structures really give you a lesson on keeping an eye on the gauges. I start up the plane within half a minute. Procedure calls for several minutes. simplified engine parameters and dm make you less aware on what happening, and more aware of time limits

Yes it would, but I hope for more complexity in dm and communication that really works. It would be nice with a general improvement

It stretching it far sayingDCS sort of is there. But they are in their own way. I think a improved GB style would be best

In reference to the wish list here, I wonder if people are willing to pay for what they ask for. According to what people wish, admittedly many wishes is common sense , but many bear signs of a very hyped state of mind when written. Are there many of us willing to put the money on table for a high end state of the art sim? Do we want a sim demanding latest generation of gpu and cpu? And hold DCS prices + for each plane? Do we want the developers to include those with older rigs? I can afford both new rig and another DCS priced sim, currently I am not motivated to spend that money, this sim might do it. Personally I like a very complex DM. I care not if clickpits are implemented or not. I gladly take [ctrl]+[E] as a startup , I want realistic take offs, and landings, I like wind to be more realistic than what is offered in sims today. I like communication to work. But how far can one go in this list until it gets economically a problem?

Ye, Jade monkey campaign would be the icing on the cake 🤗

I was part of sas team several years until II got fed up about the modding war going on. Cirx was always cool and relaxed. He had a farewell gig 3 days before he passed away for a full house.

I probably do What I do in DCS and box. I buy those planes and never fly them. In hope for content I want. I understand the choice of planes that goes for itself. I am used to kickstarter in this genre It involve a risk of wasting money, not money that was meant to feed your kids, but money you can afford to loose

I firmly believed PTO was not economically feasible looking at todays standards. I clearly underestimated numbers of potential buyers. I knew interest among likeminded simmers would be great, but I always believed we were few. In my mind this is too good to be true, and I can’t let the feeling be, that it is often so. Jason know what this takes, and I guess he believe it is doable

I also gonna talk about the PBY as many times I can. That make it mandatory to implement

I am probably buying Brünner ffb at some point or VPforce controls. Regardless of it is supported here. All I know is Jason knows what we want. He do not exclude things like this in a modern new cfs

What? We are all here even BSR in known style.

I think team got an idea on who to use. No matter what written here. As for now this is as everything else hypothetical

I wonder if anyone will test this aar ww2 style

I do not think they know at this point. Whatever game engine they use or make. I think they simply not on this stage yet

Damn that was informative and had nice pictures along with it. Thank you

Of course my main interest is as realistic as possible. I don’t want to cruise along safe in my slow crates. And I do not think beta testers got any saying in strategy and gameplay. They are there for testing a product. It is more a policy culminating from loud crowd, often fighter focused since they are numerous in advantage. I agree totally with you

Burma require IJA planes , well in general all new planes. But I could not agree more about your point. it is a lot to desire in land based conflicts in that era. I believe it is quite possible if this take off and pays off

Well I can tell you I take my ban’s like a man. I hold no grudge. welcome

All that mainly flew general purpose missions had a feeling that fighters was priority one. It is undisputed and I call it a fact. I hope testing will be done by some with the same interest as me. And Custard with his squad mates would be a candidate if these small fur balls in forum can stop. I really do hope a more realistically approach regarding dm hitboxes , complexity in dm and ballistics together with defensive armament will be improved. Simply making a flight in the Kate dangerous but realistic. I really would like to see testers having all branches in mind when testing

Reason for living in sub arctic areas ? Cannot live without access to sea and mountain minutes away.

Kingfisher catalina sunderland Kawanishi H8K