Jump to content

Lusekofte

Members
  • Posts

    145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Lusekofte

  1. Beta testers deserve some respect for what they are doing for free. I would not mind being one if I knew I had time and the task suited me. I am no dog fighter but quite patience with bombers and recce and navigation. Krupinski would be a far better tester than me among many others. main thing is separating oneself from personal preference
  2. Yes I think this sim can benefit by using steam
  3. I think migrating is key word. But they need to choose what. I find it hard to believe they find someone not being active in il site. I think Jason knows many of box testers and trust them. I can see some of them as beta testers
  4. I buy directly from the developer if option is there. But I have no objections using steam.
  5. Beta testers need to have time and patience to do very repetitive tasks. Important but not that exiting work much of the time. I would be great at DM testing. Being in the receiving end. I have a lot of that experience in all cfs known to men
  6. AI will always be problematic they are fed all the information needed and got to be dumbed down. I like ai to not see me in a cloud not knowing I am coming if I am in his blind spot. Being able to avoid them by being smart. But I want them to be smart when they should know I am there. AI buddies should care for my well-being and I for theirs. I want to communicate to them and ground control. For ai gunners I like to be punished when stupid, and rewarded when deflection shooting. If the plane makes defensive movements my gunners should be affected and punished by less accuracy. I want a realistic, not hollywoodish effect when bombers get hit. I want a more complex damage model. And if my wishes come through , this sim likely not ready very soon , even with just two planes
  7. Steam work well. If there is a two option then steam get any patches later than from origin. I never let anything get between me and a sim I want. I have nothing against steam
  8. If it was that easy this new sim will be ready by tomorrow ED’s software has not yet shown its full potential. Improvements come fast and often. while GB apparently has crashed into a wall. Still I bet they come up with something to offer for the future. I find it odd that people easily abandon a brand witch been part of their hobby. And combat pilot is not made yet. I welcome all these to a fruitful future. I cannot be happier if they all have something to offer interesting me So I stand with above statement Asobo and ED apparently is in the lead on this.
  9. Just saying……. I love seaplanes more than you
  10. Potentially Gb also was not dogfight focused.
  11. A she’ll from Tirpitz fired at Lancasters sinking her and landed unexploded in a field many kilometres from Tromsoe
  12. I firmly believe Jason knows these things must be implemented
  13. I for One would hope this culminate to something more than a dogfight sim. obviously that is what we get in the start. I can’t really see my vision of a good PTO flight sim culminate next two years. But I sure support any who attempts it
  14. I love the Dauntless but are keen on Kate and Val too. I hope most for Catalina, Betty, B 26 , you know planes we likely not will get
  15. I will not sweat over a list right now of what they should make. It is way too early, I imagine they are still on the basic. And after all the bickering in GB site Jason knows what we would like to have, E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G what is economical and possible to do depend on money and time. The game itself demand pretty much. Let them breathe
  16. Nothing would please me more. I love some 38 avistion. This will also not require carriers and huge fleets of naval vessels. But I think they set up for naval warfare. My guess would be coral sea but might be Pearl Harbor. Midway Coral Sea and Pearl Harbor was together just days of intense battle with long flights.
  17. Reason I am hopeful is Jason’s insights in what works and what’s not. He has a clear memory on what a game engine need to deliver. I like a ww2 sim to have a complex dm and complex fm. Not to operate but can handle the technology that was about at that time. I am thinking fuel , drop tanks and hit boxes that simulate realistic damage. I like a good communication and ai that works well. This is all time consuming wishes. And costly. But that is what I wish for
  18. Hi I was missing getting banned by Jason, so here I am. But my main purpose of being here, is Jason’s vision of PTO. And I want a closer look at this. I will support this endeavour in all ways I can.
×
×
  • Create New...